A two day marine timekeeper with a gilt-brass dial plate that has an eight day type dial with three enamel plates attached for hours, minutes and seconds. This is flanked by a highly chased and engraved solid silver spandrel decorations and an enamel segmental dial for up and down indication. It has polished blued steel beetle and poker hands with a fine pointer blued steel second hand with a counter poised tail and a blued steel pointer for the up and down.

It has a fine, two-day full plate, un-gilt, brass movement with four turned pillars and a reversed fusee, which has Harrison’s maintaining power, and single standing barrel. The timekeeper has a four-wheel train plus a great wheel, the fourth wheel incorporating a separate reverser for the second hand. The potence plate is engraved: ‘No.16. / Pennington, Pendleton and others FOR the Son of the Inventor 1796’.

The timekeeper has a Pennington-type Earnshaw spring detent escapement mounted on a circular platform, which is mounted on the potence plate with the detent set into the plate. It has a two-arm bimetallic balance with straight, narrow arms. The finely polished, blued steel helical balance spring has terminals on both ends, the upper terminal is attached to a brass pointer stud. The jewelling extends to the balance (diamond upper endstone in a blued steel setting) and escape wheel, with endstones, the lower fourth hole and the escapement parts as mentioned.

The timekeeper is contained in a three tier, brass-bound, mahogany box, 210mms high, 210mms wide and 200mms deep, with an inlaid, brass, scalloped rectangle escutcheon on the front. The lid of the box is on butt hinges and has a brass, scalloped rectangle inlay in the lid, without engraving. The upper half is on butt-hinges and has a narrow scratched moulding just above the junction with the lower half and just below the junction with the lid. On the front of the upper half is an oval ivory tablet engraved: ‘TWO ↑ DAYS / PENNINGTON / 16’ and the push-button for the lid has a brass, scalloped-star inlaid surround. The box has raised ebony beading along the centre of the inside of the junction on the lower half, forming a dust seal when closed. The box fittings are standard, with brass drop handles on the sides and lacquered brass gimbals. The interior fittings are of standard layout, with a strut to the upper half, stopping it open at ninety degrees. The winding key is of the rising-ratchet type. The threaded bezel is of the narrow moulded type retaining the movement, in its separate brass canister with a convex glass over the dial, within the second brass bowl. The bottom of the box has a coarse, dark green baize covering.

The timekeeper has been extensively altered since its first creation, now being fitted into a more conventional, 19th century-type chronometer box dating from perhaps the 1830s. The brass furniture and gimballing have been rather heavily polished and lacquered.

It appears that in 1796 a need for two day timekeepers was expressed by the Navy and Mudge Junior had the staff of the second manufactory experiment with variations of his father’s designs to achieve this. This timekeeper, sold to the Navy in 1796, has the dial and motion work of an eight day but the single, standing barrel design of the one day timekeeper. It was converted to Earnshaw spring detent, probably in the early 19th century, was reboxed with conventional gimbals in the mid-19th century (but fitted into a separate brass case), and served as a Navy chronometer until at least 1912.

The ‘Mudge copy’ timekeepers were produced between 1794 and 1797 in a short-lived manufactory established by Thomas Mudge Junior (1760-1843), the son of the celebrated chronometer pioneer, the London watchmaker Thomas Mudge (1715/16-1794).
Mudge Junior established the factory to produce timekeepers on his father’s plan, with the intention of proving their design was sound and partly in the hopes of making money. Sadly neither aspiration was successful, owing to Mudge senior’s highly complex constant force escapement and the fact that the instruments were finished to a superb (and very expensive) standard with the whole movement gilded and the dial with top quality enamel dial plates and pierced and chased silver spandrels. The cases for the copies were very elaborate too; the movements were mounted in a fine, glazed, brass inner case, which was in turn fitted into an octagonal mahogany case, itself then mounted on trunnions in a square mahogany box.

Mudge Junior initially employed two highly respected watchmakers to operate the factory; William Howells, who would make the complex escapements and Robert Pennington, who oversaw the movement making and made the trains, the two in charge of a number of other craftsmen under them. The factory was set up on Howells’ premises, which was to prove the first of many mistakes made by Mudge Junior in this enterprise. Work started on the timekeepers in 1794 with the eighty year old Thomas Mudge Senior advising for the first few months before his death in May that year. These first instruments were signed ‘Howells and Pennington, For Thomas Mudge’ and dated with the year of completion. These instruments will be referred to as ‘H&P’ timekeepers.

Problems appeared almost immediately, as the instruments were so complex and difficult to make and adjust, and after eighteen months, only eight were complete. At this point (1796) Mudge Junior tried to introduce more craftsmen to speed up production and a row broke out with William Howells leading to Mudge dissolving the agreement and having to move the factory to another site, leaving Howells, now a rival, with a ready made factory.

Howells immediately went into partnership with Paul Philip Barraud (probably as entrepreneurial financial backer) and George Jamison (probably filling Pennington’s role as frame and train maker) and started to manufacture simpler versions of Mudge’s chronometer design (to be referred to as ‘H,B&J’ timekeepers). Among many technical simplifications, these instruments had a single mahogany box and plain white enamel dials without silver spandrels.

At the same time, Mudge Junior now employed the respected escapement maker Richard Pendleton to fill the gap left by Howells, and the timekeepers made by this new set up (still to Mudge’s high specification) were signed ‘Pennington, Pendleton and Others, For the Son of the Inventor’ (‘P,P&O’ timekeepers).

Both manufactories considered themselves as a continuation of the first factory, so the numbering of the instruments began as H&P numbers one through to eight, but then both H,B&J and P,P&O run from nine onwards!

However, neither manufactory really succeeded in making the projects work as the timekeepers were just too complex ever to be reliable in the long term. Production by Mudge Junior’s factory had ceased by 1798 after about twenty-seven timekeepers had been created (including the first eight), though not all were finished. Howell’s partnership fared even less productively, splitting up in 1799 with only about seven instruments being produced and most of those probably incomplete.

Looking at all the evidence, it now seems likely that Mudge Junior, by this time thoroughly tired of the whole expensive saga, sold out ‘lock, stock and barrel’ to Paul Philip Barraud. Then, in the early years of the 19th century, Barraud had the whole remaining stock of timekeepers from both manufactories converted to the tried and tested spring detent escapement and sold as working chronometers, renumbered to fit his own current sequence.

Of the twenty-seven made by Mudge’s manufactory we now know of the existence of eighteen instruments (table of known instruments).